CPR: Just Chest Compressions, Mouth-to-Mouth Not Necessary
New Guidelines for CPR
Medical Author: Benjamin C. Wedro, MD, FAAEM
Medical Editor: William C. Shiel, Jr., MD, FACP, FACR
Care for patients is a combination of high tech and high touch and the
American Heart Association is working hard to get the touch back into the
equation. After years of advocating bystander CPR, cardiopulmonary
pulmonary resuscitation, the "P" or pulmonary is being dropped and chest compressions may be
enough.
Why the change? Because when many bystanders are confronted with a medical
crisis, such as somebody collapsing with their heart stopping, they are too
frightened to intervene. Often they are not certain whether they might even do
harm. And with today's fear of getting an infection from an unknown person,
doing mouth to mouth breathing on a stranger can add to that fear. The concept
might be summarized by the axiom: if you can't do something well, don't do it at
all.
But in a medical crisis, people who try to help make a difference and the
result is patients survive. Studies have shown that bystanders who had no
knowledge of CPR, were given simple instructions by 911 operators to do chest
compressions and were able to save lives. It seems that there is often enough
oxygen left in the blood stream to allow the brain and other organs to survive
until medically trained personnel arrive, as long as that blood is circulated,
and chest compressions does just that.
As usual, there are special situations where breathing for a victim is
important, including babies and drowning victims, but the new recommendations
make it easier for bystanders to make a difference.
The first steps remain the same:
- Make certain the victim is unconscious and doesn't have a pulse
- If possible, send one person to call 911, send another to find an
AED
(automatic defibrillator)
- Begin chest compressions
- Don't stop until either the patient wakes up (yes, this does happen),
the rescuer gets too tired to continue, or help arrives and ask that you
stop
The best chance for a victim of
heart attack to survive depends on the
quick use of devices that can electrically stimulate a proper heartbeat. An AED,
or automatic defibrillator, can shock the heart back into a rhythm where it can
beat and sustain life. But until the AED arrives on the scene, chest
compressions are a bridge for saving a life.
There is no doubt, that the chances of survival for victims of heart attack
(or heart stoppage)
are better in certain situations, like in a hospital intensive care unit. There
is also a better chance of survival in Seattle, where many people have taken a
CPR class, than in a city where ordinary citizens have not. Using chest
compressions alone is good, but learning the whole package is certainly better,
and advocating for more AEDs in public places adds to the overall survival rate
in a community.
But the high tech can't work unless the high touch happens. The new
recommendation for chest compressions "hands only" CPR may make that difference
between life and death.
Last Editorial Review: 4/1/2008