Weight Gain & Cancer Risk
Medical Author: Melissa Conrad Stöppler, MD
Medical Editor: William C. Shiel Jr., MD, FACP, FACR
Excess weight is a known risk factor for many chronic diseases, such as
diabetes and heart disease. Obesity has also been linked an increased risk for
developing some cancers. To clarify the effects of weight gain on cancer risk,
researchers in 2007 conducted an analysis of many studies reported in medical
journals that describe 282,137 cases of cancer. The researchers wanted to see if
weight gain had an effect on the risk for certain cancer types.
In particular, the researchers looked at the risk of cancer associated with a
weight gain corresponding to an increase of 5 kg/m2 in body mass index (BMI). In
terms of actual pounds gained, a man with a normal-range BMI of 23 would need to
gain 15 kg (33 lbs.) of weight, while a woman with a BMI of 23 would need to
gain 13 kg (28.6 lbs.) to correspond to an increase of 5 in the BMI.
The results, published in the Lancet in February 2008, revealed that weight
gain is positively associated with the risk of developing a variety of types of
cancer as described below.
For women, a weight gain corresponding to an increase of 5 in the BMI
resulted in a significant increase in risk for developing four cancer types:
In women, a weaker but still positive increase in cancer risk with weight
gain was demonstrated for the following cancer types:
Significant increases in cancer risk associated with weight gain in men were
observed for the following cancers:
- esophageal adenocarcinoma (double the
risk),
- thyroid cancer,
- colon cancer, and
- renal cancer.
Additionally, weaker but still positive associations between cancer risk and
weight gain in men were noted for
While the researchers explain that the exact mechanisms by which weight gain
increases cancer risk for each type are not fully understood, the results lend
further support for the promotion of optimal nutrition, exercise, and weight
control as important preventive health measures.
Reference: Lancet 2008;1371:536-537, 569-578.
Last Editorial Review: 3/17/2008