DOCTOR'S VIEW ARCHIVE
Cat, Dog and Other Bites
Cat and dog bites carry many serious infections (some of which are
not looked for in routine laboratory tests). That is according to a
report on January 14, 1999 in The New England Journal of Medicine by
David Talan of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and
the Emergency Medicine Animal Bite Infection Study Group.
In a prospective (forward-looking) study involving 18 emergency
departments, patients were enrolled who met stringent criteria for
infection from a bite wound.
Specimens from their wounds were tested for bacteria at a research
microbiology laboratory and, in some cases, at local hospital
laboratories. The culture tests were designed to detect both aerobic
bacteria (that grow in the presence of oxygen) and anaerobic bacteria
(that require an atmosphere low or lacking in oxygen).
Dr. Talan and his coworkers "exquisitely documented the
microbiologic makeup" of cat and dog bites. The most common
infectious agents they detected belonged to the Pasteurella family of
bacteria which are associated with infections having a rapid onset.
Other bacteria encountered included staphylococci (staph) and
streptococci (strep). Staph aureus was present in 20% of dog bites
and 4% of cat bites, and Strep pyogenes was present in 12% and 0% of
dog and cat bites, respectively. A host of other bacterial causes of
disease, including some never before detected in cat or dog bite
wounds, rounded out the list.
"Animals can inflict serious, even fatal, injuries by biting. Each
year attacks by dogs cause 10 to 20 deaths in the United States,
predominantly among children," noted Dr. Gary R. Fleisher in an
editorial accompanying the report in The New England Journal.
"Even apparently minor wounds require careful exploration," stated
Dr. Fleisher, "because injuries that appear to be superficial may
overlie fractures; involve lacerated tendons, vessels, or nerves;
extend into body cavities; penetrate joint spaces; or damage
structures such as the eye."
As a rule, cat and dog bite wounds should be treated and left open
initially. This is true if they are punctures, if the bites are not
potentially disfiguring, if they only involve the arms or legs
(including the hands or feet) or if the bites to such areas occurred
more than 6-12 hours earlier (because the bacteria would be closed
into the wound).
An exception to the open-wound treatment involves cuts to the face
from cat or dog bites. Facial wounds are almost always closed to
avoid disfigurement.
About 85% of cat and dog bites harbor bacteria that can
potentially cause disease. To lower the concentration of bacteria in
contaminated wounds (and decrease the chance of infection), copious
irrigation with water or sterile saline (salt) solution at high
pressure is very helpful. Removal of dead tissue (a process called
debridement) may be done by the doctor to further decrease the
likelihood of infection.
The use of antibiotics to prevent infection after bites is
controversial. Antibiotics are usually not given routinely. They are
almost always recommended for "high-risk" wounds such as those with
"deep punctures (particularly if inflicted by cats), those that
require surgical repair, and those involving the hands."
If an antibiotic is to be prescribed, Dr. Fleisher recommends in
most cases it be (in technical terms) "a (beta)-lactam antibiotic
such as amoxicillin combined with a (beta)-lactamase inhibitor."
(These are antibiotics that are specialized to treat bacteria that
have developed certain powers of resistance to traditional
antibiotics.)
If a wound becomes overtly infected, some or all of any sutures
that have been put in are removed, pus is drained and usually
antibiotics are given by vein. Severe infections can develop after
bites. (Fever after a bite in someone who is immune suppressed is a
danger signal.)