MedicineNet.com
About Us | Privacy Policy | Site Map
November 25, 2009
MedicineNet home Picture Slideshows Diseases and conditions Symptoms and signs Procedures and tests Medications Health and Living Picture Image Collection MedTerms medical dictionary
Font Size
A
A
A


Feature Archive

Is Less-Invasive Hip Replacement Best for You?

Finding the right surgeon and asking the right questions can help determine if minimally invasive hip replacement is right for you.

WebMD Feature

Reviewed By Michael Smith

Less cutting sounds like a good thing when it comes to hip replacement. But experts say knowing the right questions to ask is key to determining if this new technique is for you.

Research recently presented at a meeting of orthopaedic specialists shows that patients often fare no better with minimally invasive hip replacement than those having a standard hip replacement -- and may do worse.

Proponents of minimally invasive hip replacement say small-incision operations can lessen blood loss, ease post-operative pain, trim hospital stays, improve scar appearance, and speed healing. In the hands of properly trained surgeons, they say, patients can expect benefits that were once unimaginable.

Richard A. Berger, MD, who refined the technique, says most of his patients go home the same day as surgery and can walk without crutches within eight days. He says his technique steers clear of muscle and tendon damage during surgery. Berger is assistant professor at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago.

But critics say minimally invasive hip replacement is overhyped and underproven. The scientific evidence supporting it has come from a small group of enthusiastic innovators, they point out. Poor positioning of hip implants during surgery can occur more frequently, in turn leading to hip dislocations and pain in the short run or failure in the longer term.

And the learning curve can be perilously steep. In one new study, the complication rate using a highly touted technique in an experienced surgeon's first 80 patients was nearly four times higher than normal. The complications were also disproportionately more serious. The study was presented during the recent annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery in Washington, D.C.

Experts advise patients who are considering minimally invasive hip replacement to educate themselves on the pros and cons of the operation and choose their surgeons carefully.

Wanted: Better Evidence

Experts say there is simply not enough scientific evidence about this new form of surgery to form firm conclusions.

More evidence and better evaluation of minimally invasive hip replacement will be necessary "before these techniques are recommended for more widespread clinical practice," concludes a recent advisory statement from the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.

"The number of patients with dramatic benefits such as walking without [crutches or a cane] the day after surgery are very few, with surgery done by a very small subset of surgeons," Brian McGrory, MD, chairman of the expert panel that wrote the AAHKS advisory, tells WebMD.

What's more, the long-term outcomes remain unknown, says Daniel J. Berry, MD, professor and chairman of the department of orthopaedic surgery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.

The goal of joint replacement is to achieve "a long-lasting, well-functioning implant" that is free of complications, he points out.

"It's important for patients to understand that if there is an advantage to minimally invasive methods -- and I emphasize 'if' -- it will be for only a very short period of time, a few weeks or at most a few months," Berry tells WebMD.

"And after that, conventional methods are likely to be just as good or possibly better."

Hip Replacement Debate Heats Up

With release of the new research on complications from minimally invasive hip replacement, critics have turned up the heat.

"Is it justifiable to take patients through this learning curve?" asks Thomas S. Thornhill, MD, a professor at Harvard Medical School who uses the technique himself. "I'm troubled."

If only "miraculous" surgeons can get results, which "us lesser mortals can't," then the typical orthopaedic surgeon in the community "shouldn't be doing this operation," says Richard Rothman, MD, professor and chairman of orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.




Printer-Friendly Format  |  Email to a Friend


Arthritis

Get the latest treatment options


Are you Depressed? Take the Quiz

Your Guide to Symptoms & Signs: Pinpoint Your Pain











Health categories:

Slideshows | Diseases & Conditions | Symptoms & Signs | Procedures & Tests | Medications | Health & Living | News & Views | Medical Dictionary

Popular health centers:

Allergies | Arthritis | Cancer | Diabetes | Digestion | Healthy Kids | Heart | Men's Health | Mental Health | Women's Health | More...

Publications:

ePublications (PDFs) | XML News via RSS | Audio Podcasts | Email Newsletters

MedicineNet.com:

About Us | Privacy Policy | Site Map | WebMD® | Medscape® | eMedicine® | eMedicineHealth® | RxList®

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies to the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.

©1996-2009 MedicineNet, Inc. All rights reserved. Notices and Legal Disclaimer.
MedicineNet does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.