Does Your Office Have "Sick Building Syndrome?"
During the last 20 years, concerns associated with the
quality of the indoor office environment have escalated in the American workplace. The National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has seen the number of
requests for the Institute's assistance rise dramatically, as public concern
about this problem continues to increase.
What is Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ)?
The public is
probably more familiar with the terms "Indoor Air Quality" and "Sick Building
Syndrome." "Indoor Air Quality," as the name implies, simply refers to the
quality of the air in an office environment. "Sick Building Syndrome" is a term
many people use to convey a wide range of symptoms they believe can be attributed to the
building itself. Workers typically implicate the workplace environment because
their symptoms are alleviated when they leave the office.
NIOSH prefers to use the term "Indoor Environmental Quality" (or
IEQ) to describe the problems occurring in office buildings and schools
throughout the nation. The Institute, through its Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE)
Program, evaluates potential health hazards in workplaces in response to
requests from employers, employees, employee representatives, state and local
government agencies, and Federal agencies. NIOSH investigators have found that
concerns about air quality may be caused by a number of factors, encompassing
much more than air contamination. Other factors such as comfort, noise,
lighting, ergonomic stressors (poorly designed work stations and tasks) and job-related psychosocial stressors can individually and in combination contribute
to complaints. Hence, IEQ more accurately describes the scope of the problem.
What are the typical symptoms associated with IEQ?
symptoms reported to NIOSH have been diverse and usually not suggestive of any
particular medical diagnosis. A typical spectrum of symptoms includes:
- unusual fatigue,
- varying degrees of itching or
- skin irritation,
- nasal congestion,
- dry or irritated throats, and;
How big is the IEQ problem?
During the last decade, there
has been a significant increase in public concern about IEQ. NIOSH scientists
have completed approximately 1300 evaluations related to the indoor office
environment since the late 1970's, and the percentage of the total number of
requests has risen dramatically. In 1980, requests to evaluate office
environments made up only 8% of the total requests for NIOSH investigations. In
1990, the Institute received 150 IEQ requests, which accounted for 38% of the
total. Since 1990, IEQ requests have made up 52% all requests.
Why are IEQ problems increasing?
1970's, ventilation requirements were changed to conserve fossil
fuels, and virtually air-tight buildings emerged. At the same time, a revolution
occurred in office work throughout the country. Computers and other new work
technologies forced a change in office procedures and productivity, and
ergonomic and organizational stress problems may have increased. Coupled with
the conservation measures and changing technology was a dramatic increase in the
number of workers in white collar jobs. Greater awareness of the potential for
IEQ problems may also be contributing to a rise in reporting of suspected
problems. All of these factors may have contributed to the increase.
Media coverage of IEQ has profoundly influenced the number of IEQ requests
the Institute receives. Following a network television report on the subject in
October 1992, NIOSH received over 6,000 phone calls and nearly 800 requests for
What types of IEQ problems has NIOSH found in the workplace?
NIOSH investigators have found IEQ problems caused by ventilation system
deficiencies, overcrowding, offgassing from materials in the office and
mechanical equipment, tobacco smoke, microbiological contamination, and outside
air pollutants. NIOSH has also found comfort problems due to improper
temperature and relative humidity conditions, poor lighting, and unacceptable
noise levels, as well as adverse ergonomic conditions, and job-related
What is typically involved in an investigation?
Evaluation of a potential hazard can involve various methods of
investigation. These include:
- direct observation of production processes and work
- measurement of contamination levels and extent of
- medical testing or physical examinations,
- confidential interviews, and;
- review of employer's records of injuries and illnesses, medical tests, and job