The Hygiene Hypothesis
The "Hygiene Hypothesis" is a theory that suggests a young child's environment can be "too clean" to effectively stimulate or challenge the child's immune system to respond to various threats during the time a child's immune system is maturing. As a fetus, the immune system is thought to be repressed to avoid rejecting maternal tissue, but at birth, it must start to recognize antigens that may be linked to harmful infections. If the environment is "too clean," the hypothesis suggests that the immune system will not mature properly, and may not react appropriately when the child's immune system encounters germs (viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites) or other environmental triggers (pollen, animal dander, fungal spores) later in life. The hypothesis suggests that the lack of immune system challenge results in many people developing immune-related health problems such as asthma.
Although the term "Hygiene Hypothesis" was proposed in the late 1980's, many investigators trace its origins to earlier experiments with animals, mainly mice and rats born and raised in "germ-free" or sterile environments. When experimentally exposed to low doses of an infectious agent that would not harm normally raised rodents, these germ-free adolescent and young adult animals became infected quickly and often died. When examined, the infected animals showed a slow or blunted immune response in these situations. If they were raised to adolescence or adulthood as germ-free animals and then were slowly introduced to bacteria found in their normal gastrointestinal tracts, the rodent's immune response, when exposed to the same pathogen, was much better and the animals usually survived the infection.
The key to understanding how the hygiene hypothesis might explain the high level of asthma in developed nations (and perhaps a number of other diseases such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or multiple sclerosis) is knowledge of how the immune system develops, matures, and self-regulates. Although the details of the development and function of the immune system can fill books, a very brief summation is as follows:
Proving the hygiene hypothesis is difficult because of the complexity of the developing immune system, the difficulty in designing ethical studies in infants and young children, and getting control and experimental groups of children who have parents that would allow them to be involved in such studies. Like many hypotheses, aspects or parts of this hypothesis still can be examined with the scientific method. Such work is being done with the hygiene hypothesis. For example, the development of probiotics, the oral introduction of "live microorganisms" to the intestine, is related to this hypothesis. More closely related is the development and study of the use of parasite eggs to modulate the immune response in order to treat inflammatory diseases such as Crohn's disease by modifying the immune response.
Most proponents of the hygiene hypothesis do not suggest that parents expose infants and children to infectious organisms to stimulate their immune response. They do suggest, however, that infants and children may be too protected from other children and the environment so that they fail to develop a normal immune system. This protection or isolation (for example, sterile foods, constant cleaning of the infant and child, social isolation from other children, no outdoor playing) may make children prone to develop immune-related diseases.
Although other investigators suggest increases in asthma and other immune-related diseases are due to other factors (for example, pollution, smoking [secondhand smoke in children], toxin ingestion, and others), each is still a hypothesis until proven by the data gathered and examined by scientific methodology. Unfortunately, this takes time, effort and research money so the clues and eventual answers to the hypothesis will not come easily. Perhaps future data will definitively show that humans can be "too clean."
Last Editorial Review: 3/9/2012 2:08:34 PM