Doing The Right Thing
Medical Author:
Jay W. Marks, M.D.
I
often am asked by other physicians to assist with their patients who have
difficult-to-diagnose gastrointestinal problems. Many of these patients are
suspected of having irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Since there is
no specific test for IBS, the diagnosis of IBS is made by recognizing a
grouping of characteristic symptoms and excluding diseases that can mimic
IBS. The issue always arises as to what constitutes complete testing in
order to exclude diseases other than IBS. Not all patients thought to have IBS
require complete testing. The patients
who do are those with moderate or severe symptoms that do not respond
sufficiently to simple and safe treatments. When the generalist (family practice physician
or internist) is unable to make a diagnosis and/or recommend other
treatment, it is time for the patient to see a specialist, a gastroenterologist.
A
detailed medical history that is taken by a knowledgeable, experienced, and
interested physician is the single most important "test" for IBS. It
may be necessary to ask patients to return for further history-taking after
instructing them to make additional observations about their symptoms. The goal is to find consistent patterns of symptoms. By the
time a thorough history has been obtained, the physician usually will have a
good idea of whether IBS or another disease is present.
For example, intermittent obstruction of the small bowel (a
common problem) causes symptoms that are similar to IBS. However, there is a
difference between the sequence and timing of symptoms in small bowel
obstruction and IBS. If a disease
other than IBS is suspected, specific testing for that disease should be
performed.
After the history, a thorough physical examination,
particularly of the abdomen, is important, although only occasionally does the
physical examination reveal a cause for difficult-to-diagnose
symptoms.
The next step in testing is the consideration
of diseases or conditions other than IBS that may be the cause of the
patient's symptoms. For example, there may
be a tumor or inflammation ("itis") of the intestinal
lining. Theoretically, these may occur anywhere along
the gastrointestinal tract from the stomach to the colon. X-rays of the stomach, small
intestine, and colon are helpful, but for the colon
and
uppermost
gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) endoscopy is preferred. Endoscopy is a procedure
in which a lighted tube and camera are inserted into the gastrointestinal tract so
that the doctor can examine the structures inside the tract. Endoscopy can identify anatomical
abnormalities that can be seen with the naked eye; however, endoscopy
is especially helpful in diagnosing histologic abnormalities with the microscope because
the tissue of the lining of the gastrointestinal tract can be
biopsied during the endoscopic procedure. It is important to biopsy each part of the
gastrointestinal tract many times since some diseases are "patchy,"
which means that they affect some parts of the lining but not others.
When endoscopy and biopsies do not reveal a cause for
the symptoms, it is time to consider special x-ray studies of the small
intestine. The small bowel, or small intestine, is a part of the
gastrointestinal tract that cannot be examined easily by endoscopy
.
There are several types of small bowel x-rays. In the more common types,
either thick or thin barium is swallowed and multiple x-ray films are then
taken as the barium progresses through the small intestine. A third type
of small intestinal x-ray is called an enteroclysis study.
For enteroclysis, a tube is passed progressively through the mouth or
nostril, the stomach, and into the first part of the small intestine.
A thin barium solution is then injected through the tube, followed by a
watery fluid. As in the other types
of small intestinal x-rays, films are taken as the barium progresses through the
small intestine. Each of the three types of x-rays has advantages and
disadvantages as compared with the other types.
Which type of x-ray is best for a patient needs to be decided by the
gastroenterologist and radiologist jointly. One type is not appropriate for all
patients. In fact, it may occasionally be appropriate to perform two types of
studies in the same patient.